Cuteftp pro slow transfer9/20/2023 ![]() ![]() ![]() Since that day, I have never been using WS_FTP again, and I never regretted it. WS_FTP Pro (7.0) completely lost during my tests because at that time, they only offered 40bit data and control connections, and no FXP (SSL or not) at all. One day, I wrote a HOWTO on secure FTP transfers and I tested all currently available FTP clients that claim SSL functionality. Things like FXP (very useful for both professional and kiddie use), SSL Encryption, Queueing and much more has been a part within FlashFXP much longer than in WS_FTP (if they implemented it at all). Once I really tested FlashFXP, things were clear to me.įlashFXP had tons of more options completely unknown to WS_FTP. I've been a longtime (registered) user of WS_FTP Pro for a couple of years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |